Simon Reakes

Meditation: Allowing the stage of the soul to become quiet

Simon Reakes
Meditation: Allowing the stage of the soul to become quiet

‹Living Connections› was the first public event devoted to the topic of meditation at the Goetheanum in summer 2017. In preparation a series of interviews began, called ‹Meditation in Conversation›. It was printed as a reader entitled ‹Meditation in Context›, available to all participants. Since then, we publish a new interview monthly conducted by Inessa Guseva with experts from the network.

Simon Reakes’ background is in homeopathy, contemplative practice and meditation. Through The Field Centre (Ruskin Mill Trust educational center, Nailsworth, UK) he taught at the MA programme in Special Educational Needs, the Biodynamic Training programme and the Teacher Development Programme, where he offered courses on the biography of Rudolf Steiner, the foundations of anthroposophy, and an introduction to Goethean Science.

Simon has the unique privilege of being the person who laid the foundation for the name of the Living Connections conference. Before the conference took place, over the course of several long days, the preparation group had many fruitless and tiring discussions, trying to find the perfect name for the event. Nonetheless, the most fitting one remained out of our reach and hard to find. We had a lot of doubts and couldn’t reach a consensus: a name that was easy on the ear, was modern, had a deeper meaning and was fitting for that conference. We thought we'd reached an impasse.

And that was the moment when Simon Reakes offered his suggestion. The name. Live in Connection. For most of our group, this was the long overdue starting point. Finally, we managed to have a productive conversation, and eventually, we agreed upon Living Connections. Worldwide Perspectives on Anthroposophical Meditation as the title of the conference. It was meaningful and fit perfectly for what we had in mind.

The title Living Connections refers on the one hand to the relationship each and every one of us has to ourselves, the inner dialogue connecting us to something higher, beyond the limitations of our physical boundaries. On the other hand, it refers to the connection to everything we meet outside of us: people, nature and other beings in the world.

How did you start meditating?

For me, this was a question of becoming interested in spiritual ideas and spiritual practices at quite an early age. When I was about eighteen, I was interested in two domains of life. First, I was interested in the approach of existentialism, and I avidly read Jean-Paul Sartre’s Being and Nothingness. Sartre was speaking about the human condition; what it means to be a human being today, and the appearances and beingness that we encounter. Secondly, I was also interested in what can be termed mystical and spiritual beliefs. At that time the easiest literature to come across was that of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition. I was intrigued by their mystical approach, the practices that they were engaged in, and the ideas they held about the world and life.

I can see that these two domains, represented by existentialism and the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, appear to be diametrically opposed. In the latter, I was reading about obscure shamanistic practices—journeys into others worlds, what happens to the soul after death—and other such esoteric things. With the former, I was interested in the human condition. What does the modern human being of today actually experience? For example, there is loneliness, isolation, and the pure fact of beingness. I felt like I walked in both of these two domains, and, between them, I carried the question: how does one engage with the spiritual world today? I also had the question: what does the human being encounter in the heart of everyday reality? Was this not also a spiritual experience?

Simon Reakes's background is homeopathy, contemplative practice and meditation. Starting from the Field Center (Ruskin Mill Trust Education Center), he taught therapists, farmers and teachers in courses on the biography of Rudolf Steiner and the basics of anthroposophy and gave introductions to the Goethean science.  Drawing Nathaniel Williams

Simon Reakes's background is homeopathy, contemplative practice and meditation. Starting from the Field Center (Ruskin Mill Trust Education Center), he taught therapists, farmers and teachers in courses on the biography of Rudolf Steiner and the basics of anthroposophy and gave introductions to the Goethean science.

Drawing Nathaniel Williams

Later on, I began to read quite broadly and widely in spiritual and esoteric literature, and in my mid-twenties, I came across the work of Rudolf Steiner. I remember hearing his name for the first time in a conversation with some friends one day, and I had the thought: I must find out who this man was and what he was all about. A little while later after studying his book Theosophy, I bought a copy of Guidance in Esoteric Training. It had the Rose Cross meditation in it and examples of other meditations from the early Esoteric School. I recall thinking to myself that I wanted to begin practicing the main morning and evening meditation exercises. So, I made a little regime for myself, waking up early, and before any other thought had passed through my mind I sat myself down to meditate. And this I duly did.

However, what I discovered was not what I was expecting at all, because I found out that I had little capacity to concentrate. I just sat there with my monkey mind going very fast, and with all the usual distractions that the monkey mind can bring: thoughts about the world, anxieties, and worries, these sorts of things. I went back to Guidance in Esoteric Training and, having started down this path, I realised: meditation is not easy. I didn't have anyone immediately around me to whom I could turn to talk about handling the obstacles that arise in meditation, or how to actually—day-by-day—develop a meditation practice. I had Steiner's instructions, but I didn't have anyone with whom I could share or discuss my struggles.

In Buddhism they have something called the sangha. The sangha is a community of practitioners, monastic or lay, who meditate together and are committed to Buddha’s Eightfold Path. Within this community there is the possibility of sharing practices. This reality of a community of practitioners wasn't available in anthroposophy at that time. Talking about meditation in anthroposophy was still very much taboo back then. Meditation was something that you did in private, in the seclusion of your own home. And that was that. Not surprisingly then, after a while, I became disenchanted with meditation practice. I thought: I can't do this. Basically, I couldn't reconcile my own practice with what I read in the instructions. But I still wanted to meditate. I had chosen the path of anthroposophy, but with regard to the anthroposophical path of meditation, I found that I didn't have clear, supportive, step-by-step processes to follow. At that young age, it didn't seem clear to me what I was supposed to do. Or rather, I knew of course what I was supposed to do, but the capacity of how to do it was beyond me I felt.

Then, around the age of thirty, I went on a Buddhist retreat for a month. During that month I got very clear instructions on meditation practice, and from several very experienced meditation teachers. For myself, I found that the person-to-person approach was just what I needed. On the retreat we practiced standard vipassana, or insight meditation; the bringing of the mind to calm, and just being with what is and whatever arises. There was one practice session in the morning, one at midday, and another at the end of the day. By the end of the retreat I realised that I could do this. I was indeed capable of meditating. Paradoxically, however, I also realised that Buddhist meditation itself wasn't for me. The philosophical truths of Buddhism, that everything is impermanent (anicca) and empty (suññatā) and that there is no-self (anattā), didn’t ring true for me from my understanding and experiences of anthroposophy. Of course, this is one of the distinctions between anthroposophical and Buddhist meditation; in the Buddhist tradition whatever arises in the meditation is impermanent, empty, and also there is no self in the meditation. Having worked with anthroposophy, I realized this was not the path I was on.

I gained a lot from my Buddhist meditation retreat and to this day I am immensely grateful for the experience. It gave me something that I had been missing within the anthroposophical community. A big part of this was simply being able to share and ask questions that naturally arise around meditation practice, such as: How do I do this? What posture should I adopt? If I am not going to focus on my breath, what do I focus on? How should I deal with distractions? How should I deal with becoming sleepy? Being able to share such questions openly and honestly with others was of immense benefit.

Having had the benefit of these experiences I then returned to Steiner's works and picked one particular meditation to work with. Ever since I have worked with one meditation pretty much the whole time. On occasion I have worked with other verses from Steiner, but I have always had the feeling of not quite exhausting this one meditation, and so I keep coming back to it.

Why do you meditate?

That’s a good question. Again, as this is personal question, what follows entails some self-disclosure. Continuing from the theme of the two domains we already discussed, I would say that one answer is that meditation reconciles the existential domain with that of spiritual becoming. Through ongoing meditation practice I recognise that in my day-to-day life I am more awake, clearer, and more open. The effects of meditation bring calm into the emotional life, clarity into the thought life and also the element of creative choice in life itself. Fundamentally I think, meditation is a journey towards the real self, or, one might say, towards the realisation of self. We have the aspects of ourselves that come and go: emotions, thoughts, moods, aspects of the personality. Yet underneath these there is an abiding self. A dedicated meditation practice can bring us closer to this, so that month after month, year after year, we can come closer to the experience of being an ‘I.’ Meditation accompanies us in our becoming.

What is the most memorable experience for you in Living Connections, First public Event on Meditation at the Goetheanum: July 7-9 2017?

There were so many memorable experiences, but if I had to choose one then I would say the improvised music. I loved the ambience that was created through the improvised music, and it was something very special. Because it was improvised, it can never be repeated. I think the conference would have been different without the special mood that the music brought, so I'm very thankful for what was brought into the conference through this music. It allowed something very fine to be present at our meetings. It created a new page, upon which things could then appear. What followed out of the improvisations were wonderful interactions with people, truly human meetings in the broadest and fullest sense of the world. The door for those meetings, however, was opened through the improvised music.

Could you outline examples of the basic anthroposophic meditation or exercises in your understanding?

In essence, this is very simple. It involves going to a place of stillness, a place of bringing the contents of the soul, of the mental and emotional life, to a stillness. I can liken it to allowing the stage of the soul to become quiet, clear and serene, and as far as possible clear. This is the stage of cultivating stable attention. The stable attention then needs to become a sustained attention, a deeper state where there are far fewer interruptions occurring in the consciousness. The soul has turned away from the sense world, allowed the residue of the remembrances of the physical world and mental contents to die down, and the next step is to work with a meditation object. For me, this is a verse from Steiner. For some people, it can be an image, or an image and a verse. Whatever content one has chosen can then be placed on the stage of the soul. I then live in the verse as fully, as devotedly as possible, so that the meditation object is the only content within my soul. Having done that, the soul can then let the object go, and allow an empty space to be created.

This newly created empty space is also an active space. It is a place of concentration; not of hard concentration as in an intellectual concentration, but of a deepened sustained attention. There then follows a period of being attentive to the active and receptive space that has been created to see what may appear. And if something does appear, then this is a grace. The engagement with the act of appearance on the stage of the soul is very sensitive though. It requires great openness; listening and abiding in a very quiet, attentive way, and allowing whatever wants to come to then come.

After a period of time, there is a gentle waning of the sustained attention. You can feel yourself disengaging from that state, and the meditation begins to come to a natural close. There then follows a feeling of thankfulness, a quiet sense of gratitude before the meditation session properly ends.

Conversation lead by Inessa Guseva

Picture: Kenrick Mills/Unsplash